Comments on: Stable Abstractions Principle http://ifacethoughts.net/2006/04/20/stable-abstractions-principle/ Thoughts on software development and related, by Abhijit Nadgouda Sun, 21 Mar 2010 09:59:15 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: I can’t believe I get paid for this « I Built His Cage http://ifacethoughts.net/2006/04/20/stable-abstractions-principle/comment-page-1/#comment-363635 I can’t believe I get paid for this « I Built His Cage Wed, 07 Jan 2009 04:00:18 +0000 http://ifacethoughts.net/2006/04/20/stable-abstractions-principle/#comment-363635 [...] This is endemic of the design of the mess I alluded to in Chaos Crusher. It also flies in the face of conventional (or maybe it’s not) thought on package design: lower-level packages should be more stable than higher-level packages. [...] [...] This is endemic of the design of the mess I alluded to in Chaos Crusher. It also flies in the face of conventional (or maybe it’s not) thought on package design: lower-level packages should be more stable than higher-level packages. [...]

]]> By: Niclas http://ifacethoughts.net/2006/04/20/stable-abstractions-principle/comment-page-1/#comment-329554 Niclas Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:41:26 +0000 http://ifacethoughts.net/2006/04/20/stable-abstractions-principle/#comment-329554 No problem. I think this is a really good summary on design principles, the best I've found online. Thanks for publishing. While I'm at it, I think there's a typo in the entry about Stable Dependencies Principle: <blockquote>A package should only depend upon packages that are more stable that it is.</blockquote> Should it be "... stable <em>than</em> it is."? No problem. I think this is a really good summary on design principles, the best I’ve found online. Thanks for publishing.

While I’m at it, I think there’s a typo in the entry about Stable Dependencies Principle:

A package should only depend upon packages that are more stable that it is.

Should it be “… stable than it is.”?

]]> By: Abhijit Nadgouda http://ifacethoughts.net/2006/04/20/stable-abstractions-principle/comment-page-1/#comment-329467 Abhijit Nadgouda Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:26:32 +0000 http://ifacethoughts.net/2006/04/20/stable-abstractions-principle/#comment-329467 Thanks for catching in Niclas. It has been corrected. Sometimes I confuse myself more than I should while writing :-) Thanks for catching in Niclas. It has been corrected. Sometimes I confuse myself more than I should while writing :-)

]]> By: Niclas http://ifacethoughts.net/2006/04/20/stable-abstractions-principle/comment-page-1/#comment-329460 Niclas Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:20:19 +0000 http://ifacethoughts.net/2006/04/20/stable-abstractions-principle/#comment-329460 "The concrete classes, which are instable, and are expected to change, depend on the concrete classes. " Is this correct? “The concrete classes, which are instable, and are expected to change, depend on the concrete classes. ”

Is this correct?

]]> By: OO Design Principles on iface thoughts http://ifacethoughts.net/2006/04/20/stable-abstractions-principle/comment-page-1/#comment-1688 OO Design Principles on iface thoughts Mon, 13 Nov 2006 12:57:41 +0000 http://ifacethoughts.net/2006/04/20/stable-abstractions-principle/#comment-1688 [...] Stable Abstractions Principle [...] [...] Stable Abstractions Principle [...]

]]>