<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web 2.0 Lies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ifacethoughts.net/2006/11/09/web-20-lies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ifacethoughts.net/2006/11/09/web-20-lies/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on software development and related, by Abhijit Nadgouda</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:27:34 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Web 3.0 Or How To Kill Simplicity on iface thoughts</title>
		<link>http://ifacethoughts.net/2006/11/09/web-20-lies/comment-page-1/#comment-1674</link>
		<dc:creator>Web 3.0 Or How To Kill Simplicity on iface thoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 06:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifacethoughts.net/2006/11/09/web-20-lies/#comment-1674</guid>
		<description>[...] I have faced questions whether Web 2.0 is a new product from Microsoft. This is a good example of confusion that 2.0 has created, which we want to extend with 3.0 now! Version numbers work well within the software community, because they imply things that the software community can understand. Web 2.0 is an effort to bring back interest in Web after the dotcom bubble burst. Web has not changed, our ways of using it has changed out of learning from mistakes. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I have faced questions whether Web 2.0 is a new product from Microsoft. This is a good example of confusion that 2.0 has created, which we want to extend with 3.0 now! Version numbers work well within the software community, because they imply things that the software community can understand. Web 2.0 is an effort to bring back interest in Web after the dotcom bubble burst. Web has not changed, our ways of using it has changed out of learning from mistakes. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
