<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web 3.0 Or How To Kill Simplicity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ifacethoughts.net/2006/11/13/web-30-or-how-to-kill-simplicity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ifacethoughts.net/2006/11/13/web-30-or-how-to-kill-simplicity/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on software development and related, by Abhijit Nadgouda</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:27:34 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Web2.0 Is Now English &#124; iface thoughts</title>
		<link>http://ifacethoughts.net/2006/11/13/web-30-or-how-to-kill-simplicity/comment-page-1/#comment-421419</link>
		<dc:creator>Web2.0 Is Now English &#124; iface thoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 02:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifacethoughts.net/2006/11/13/web-30-or-how-to-kill-simplicity/#comment-421419</guid>
		<description>[...] soon going to move on to something else, and continue further. The phrase Web 2.0 itself has been confusing. Its popularity is born more out of marketing than anything else. It was already bad enough that it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] soon going to move on to something else, and continue further. The phrase Web 2.0 itself has been confusing. Its popularity is born more out of marketing than anything else. It was already bad enough that it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On Web Versions &#124; iface thoughts</title>
		<link>http://ifacethoughts.net/2006/11/13/web-30-or-how-to-kill-simplicity/comment-page-1/#comment-88854</link>
		<dc:creator>On Web Versions &#124; iface thoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 02:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifacethoughts.net/2006/11/13/web-30-or-how-to-kill-simplicity/#comment-88854</guid>
		<description>[...] uses descriptive terminology to explain the evolution of Web, and not the dumb numbers. I agree, numbers are not a good way of tracking concepts and ideas. They fail to convey the value and leaves everything for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] uses descriptive terminology to explain the evolution of Web, and not the dumb numbers. I agree, numbers are not a good way of tracking concepts and ideas. They fail to convey the value and leaves everything for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: So Much For Using Buzzwords &#124; iface thoughts</title>
		<link>http://ifacethoughts.net/2006/11/13/web-30-or-how-to-kill-simplicity/comment-page-1/#comment-64243</link>
		<dc:creator>So Much For Using Buzzwords &#124; iface thoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 07:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifacethoughts.net/2006/11/13/web-30-or-how-to-kill-simplicity/#comment-64243</guid>
		<description>[...] I see a the commonality - they are all, or at least most of them, Web 2.0 jargon. I would have put Web 2.0 itself or Web 3.0 on the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I see a the commonality &#8211; they are all, or at least most of them, Web 2.0 jargon. I would have put Web 2.0 itself or Web 3.0 on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MetaGlossary - Meaningful Results on iface thoughts</title>
		<link>http://ifacethoughts.net/2006/11/13/web-30-or-how-to-kill-simplicity/comment-page-1/#comment-2082</link>
		<dc:creator>MetaGlossary - Meaningful Results on iface thoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifacethoughts.net/2006/11/13/web-30-or-how-to-kill-simplicity/#comment-2082</guid>
		<description>[...] This somehow got me interested, the world moving towards Semantic Web can help itself with semantic results. Some trials and I really got hooked on to it. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This somehow got me interested, the world moving towards Semantic Web can help itself with semantic results. Some trials and I really got hooked on to it. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
