<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Back To Manual Spamming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ifacethoughts.net/2006/11/26/back-to-manual-spamming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ifacethoughts.net/2006/11/26/back-to-manual-spamming/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on software development and related, by Abhijit Nadgouda</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 09:59:15 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Spammers Find Innovative Ways To Crack CAPTCHAs &#124; iface thoughts</title>
		<link>http://ifacethoughts.net/2006/11/26/back-to-manual-spamming/comment-page-1/#comment-124985</link>
		<dc:creator>Spammers Find Innovative Ways To Crack CAPTCHAs &#124; iface thoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 19:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifacethoughts.net/2006/11/26/back-to-manual-spamming/#comment-124985</guid>
		<description>[...] have seen use of humans by spammers to get smap through the CAPTCHAs. Spammers are getting more innovative and have devised [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have seen use of humans by spammers to get smap through the CAPTCHAs. Spammers are getting more innovative and have devised [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Revisit CAPTCHA &#124; iface thoughts</title>
		<link>http://ifacethoughts.net/2006/11/26/back-to-manual-spamming/comment-page-1/#comment-59591</link>
		<dc:creator>Revisit CAPTCHA &#124; iface thoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 03:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifacethoughts.net/2006/11/26/back-to-manual-spamming/#comment-59591</guid>
		<description>[...] self as a human is still a problem which can lockout some users. Additionally CAPTCHAs fail if humans and not bots are used for spamming. I still consider Akismet to be a better solution. Akismet uses the community to identify spam [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] self as a human is still a problem which can lockout some users. Additionally CAPTCHAs fail if humans and not bots are used for spamming. I still consider Akismet to be a better solution. Akismet uses the community to identify spam [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wikiasari - Another Crowdsourcing Experiment on iface thoughts</title>
		<link>http://ifacethoughts.net/2006/11/26/back-to-manual-spamming/comment-page-1/#comment-3757</link>
		<dc:creator>Wikiasari - Another Crowdsourcing Experiment on iface thoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 16:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifacethoughts.net/2006/11/26/back-to-manual-spamming/#comment-3757</guid>
		<description>[...] I think it is great. In my opinion spamming exploits a loophole in the current search engine algorithms, since they are purely link based. Human contribution to these algorithms can fix these loopholes and probably work as the best solution for spamming. ChaCha is another search engine which has contributions from humans, but in a different way. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I think it is great. In my opinion spamming exploits a loophole in the current search engine algorithms, since they are purely link based. Human contribution to these algorithms can fix these loopholes and probably work as the best solution for spamming. ChaCha is another search engine which has contributions from humans, but in a different way. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maths Behind PageRank on iface thoughts</title>
		<link>http://ifacethoughts.net/2006/11/26/back-to-manual-spamming/comment-page-1/#comment-2362</link>
		<dc:creator>Maths Behind PageRank on iface thoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 14:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifacethoughts.net/2006/11/26/back-to-manual-spamming/#comment-2362</guid>
		<description>[...] This can also be considered to be the reason behind all the spam. Spammers try to insert links to the target website so that its pagerank increases. I think, just like other metrics even the pagerank is just an indication of quality and can be manipulated. This algorithm assumes that linking will happen out of liking of a web site, but this can be manipulated using spamming and programs like link exchange. Scoble mentions how Microsoft can be world&#8217;s greatest SEO. Can there be a better algorithm for calculating and assigning importance to web pages? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This can also be considered to be the reason behind all the spam. Spammers try to insert links to the target website so that its pagerank increases. I think, just like other metrics even the pagerank is just an indication of quality and can be manipulated. This algorithm assumes that linking will happen out of liking of a web site, but this can be manipulated using spamming and programs like link exchange. Scoble mentions how Microsoft can be world&#8217;s greatest SEO. Can there be a better algorithm for calculating and assigning importance to web pages? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Battling Comment Spam: Human Versus Human &#171; Lorelle on WordPress</title>
		<link>http://ifacethoughts.net/2006/11/26/back-to-manual-spamming/comment-page-1/#comment-2162</link>
		<dc:creator>Battling Comment Spam: Human Versus Human &#171; Lorelle on WordPress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 17:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifacethoughts.net/2006/11/26/back-to-manual-spamming/#comment-2162</guid>
		<description>[...] When I first brought up the issue of humans manually comment spamming, a lot of people were skeptical, but those in the know were very worried. According to Abhijit Nadgouda of ifacethoughts and The Guardian, comment spammers are now hiring cheap labor to break through captchas and registrations to spread comment spam all over your blogs. Though a single spammer cannot be as fast as a machine, thousands of them together than spell a lot of trouble. Captchas force you to identify certain characters and enter them, which machines cannot follow. This works fine assuming that humans, for whom captchas are built, do not spam. The outsourcing trend will overcome this. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] When I first brought up the issue of humans manually comment spamming, a lot of people were skeptical, but those in the know were very worried. According to Abhijit Nadgouda of ifacethoughts and The Guardian, comment spammers are now hiring cheap labor to break through captchas and registrations to spread comment spam all over your blogs. Though a single spammer cannot be as fast as a machine, thousands of them together than spell a lot of trouble. Captchas force you to identify certain characters and enter them, which machines cannot follow. This works fine assuming that humans, for whom captchas are built, do not spam. The outsourcing trend will overcome this. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abhijit Nadgouda</title>
		<link>http://ifacethoughts.net/2006/11/26/back-to-manual-spamming/comment-page-1/#comment-2000</link>
		<dc:creator>Abhijit Nadgouda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 02:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifacethoughts.net/2006/11/26/back-to-manual-spamming/#comment-2000</guid>
		<description>True, moderation is the only way of truly avoiding spam. Challenge question is effective, but it will also discourage the right guy who wants to comment. I think commenting should be easy, only then will there be conversations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, moderation is the only way of truly avoiding spam. Challenge question is effective, but it will also discourage the right guy who wants to comment. I think commenting should be easy, only then will there be conversations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Karr</title>
		<link>http://ifacethoughts.net/2006/11/26/back-to-manual-spamming/comment-page-1/#comment-1999</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Karr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 01:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifacethoughts.net/2006/11/26/back-to-manual-spamming/#comment-1999</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s incredible!  I still approve every comment on my blog and it&#039;s incredible the volume of SPAM I receive, even with Akismet.  I have had much more luck with contact form spam by implementing a &quot;challenge question&quot;.  I wonder what the success of outsourcing would be on challenge questions which require comprehension and familiarity with the website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s incredible!  I still approve every comment on my blog and it&#8217;s incredible the volume of SPAM I receive, even with Akismet.  I have had much more luck with contact form spam by implementing a &#8220;challenge question&#8221;.  I wonder what the success of outsourcing would be on challenge questions which require comprehension and familiarity with the website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
