Superficial Standards

Surprising stories are coming out of the effort of making OOXML as a standard. The one creating the hype is the one from Sweden. However, the vote has been retracked. Apparently some Microsoft employee tried to bribe some partners for the vote. Now even the Hungarian Standards body is reconsidering its vote.

Unlike many, I do not feel that this speaks low of Microsoft. In fact I feel that Microsoft has come out better out of this. It takes courage to admit that one of its employees did something invalid, knowing that this will affect vote on OOXML. I want to ask a different question. Why is someone so hell bent upon making OOXML a standard? Does becoming a standard make it golden? I think this is a very superficial way of looking at standards.

The benefit of a standards is mainly for the end user. A standard does not get modified on whims and fancies of any business entity. A standard is something that vendors can adhere to, which stabilizes the domain. A standard gives other vendors an opportunity to comply to it and provide interoperability across various tools. A standard is made for the end user, not for the vendor. A standard which cannot provide these benefits, is just a superficial standard or standard for a namesake. Should it be called a standard at all? I hope the ones voting on this are asking these questions.

Creating a standard is not a mere technicality or a formality of getting stamped. It is commitment to the end user to provide the benefits. I think the phrase competing standards already causes a lot of self contradiction and confusion. If there are competing standards, at least let them prove to be truly beneficial to the users rather than just having to get voted or stamped.

Discussion [Participate or Link]

  1. The Standardization Process For OOXML | iface thoughts said:

    […] Updegrove answers the question. I have been following the developments, not because it is getting dramatic, but because this will truly affect an end user like me. Also, somewhere this will also give us an […]

  2. OOXML Gaining Support In India Through Microsoft’s Partner NGOs? | iface thoughts said:

    […] Sharma reports that Microsoft is trying to promote OOXML to the Indian ministry through NGOs. Deja vu? Microsoft says that it was a voluntary decision for the partners. But it will be interesting to […]

Say your thought!

If you want to use HTML you can use these tags: <a>, <em>, <strong>, <abbr>, <code>, <blockquote>. Closing the tags will be appreciated as this site uses valid XHTML.



Abhijit Nadgouda
iface Consulting
+91 9819820312
My bookmarks


This is the weblog of Abhijit Nadgouda where he writes down his thoughts on software development and related topics. You are invited to subscribe to the feed to stay updated or check out more subscription options. Or you can choose to browse by one of the topics.